Background Image
Previous Page  4 / 14 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 / 14 Next Page
Page Background

FAO/LRG Collaboration

to better quantify global

agricultural mitigation potential

In contrast, when it comes to the better

quantification of the potential of agriculture

to contribute to the GHG mitigation (both

technical and economic potential), the

same progress has not been made. The

IPCC Fifth Assessment Report found that

the most cost-effective mitigation options

in agriculture were in cropland and grazing

land management and restoration of organic

soils. Based on a range of studies, the IPCC

estimated a global mitigation potential of up

to 1.6 Gt CO

2

e in 2030 at a cost up to US$20/

tCO

2

e, and up to 4.6 Gt CO

2

e at a cost up to

US$100/tCO

2

e.

However, these estimates rely in many

cases on studies that considered mitigation

options in isolation; the report also noted

the difficulty of estimating accurately the

regional distribution of future mitigation

potential. It is therefore critical to improve

our knowledge of the technical mitigation

potential of individual mitigation actions,

and their relevance to specific agricultural

systems; and there is a growing realisation

that mitigation actions cannot be considered

in isolation; true mitigation potential needs

to consider ‘baskets’ of actions assessed

in terms of impacts on multiple gases and

synergies or trade-offs between individual

actions.

Over the past 3 years, the Animal Production

and Health Division of FAO developed the

Global Livestock Environmental Accounting

Model (GLEAM). GLEAM pulls together

the existing knowledge on production

practices and emissions pathways to

create a framework for disaggregation

and comparisons of emissions on a global

scale. The model is developed for six animal

species (cattle, buffalo, sheep, goats, pigs,

chickens) and related edible products. It

recognizes two farming systems for ruminant

species (mixed and grazing), three for pigs

(backyard, intermediate and industrial)

and three for chicken (backyard, industrial

egg and industrial meat). Altogether, this

amounts to over 14,000 supply chains,

defined here as unique sets of commodity,

farming system, country and climatic zone.

The physical area corresponding to each of

these sets is further decomposed in cells in

a Geographical Information System.

Considerable effort by a number of organisations has gone into obtaining more accurate predictions of agricultural

greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) at the global and regional scale. These efforts have resulted in a number of

databases and models now being available that can be used to calculate emissions for specific agricultural systems

using standard methodologies and standard publicly available data sources (e.g. FAO, EDGAR).